Eternal One
Babylon Project
Registered: Feb 2001
Location:
Posts: 397 |
Dunno if it would go exactly the way you are describing SGT_R22eR, but you've got an excellent point there. As you said, high pressure always fills lower pressure, filling up a pressure gap. A hot object always transmits it's warmth to a more cold object, thus filling up a temperature gap. An electron travels from negative potential to positive potential, thus filling up an electric gap. There are countless of examples of the same thing, found everywhere from normal life itself too. Called enthropy theory it is, the universum's eternal goal. Transferring of the different aspects of space and matter towards low-energy, homogenious state. I couldn't find no reason even in real life why it wouldn't happen in gravimetric fields. That would be unnatural.
Heh, reminds me of a debate I've had with a number of physics teachers. Currently, the science has two strong points telling us what is "future", what is the direction of time. We know that we're going towards what we call future, when 1) overall enthropy grows (in other words, objects move towards homogenious state) and 2) the universe expands, according to physicists. What I asked was how do we know that these two things aren't the same? How do we know that the universe doesn't expand to fill a gap in unknown matter, space, or something else? How do we know that the projected slowing of the expansion isn't caused by the increased gravity in the universe at all, but rather because getting near of reaching a homogenious state with something else? None of them gave me straight "yes" or "no", just ignored the subject. Well, that's what all scientists do 
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
09-03-2001 06:28 PM
