Charger
Murdock
Registered: Mar 2001
Location: Downton, Diego Garcia, BIOT
Posts: 421 |
as i have said in the past, you can't apply logic to what the military does. it just doesn't work out very well unless you understand the objectives.
first, neptune has no surface! it is a gas giant! any installations would have to either be in orbit or on one of its moons. second, while it is an excellant choice for a refueling/fuel refinery, this advantage makes it a poor choice for a military research and testing facility.
pluto, and its moon charon are much better choices. they are isolated, maybe not from intersystem jumps, but a shoot first ask questions later policy will take care of that REAL quick. second, the planet is STABLE. the current theory is that it is a lump of rock, which means that you do not have to worry about the planet screwing up your data. it the planet is also supposed to have an extremally low gravity, so, that means that you can actually have you shipyard on the planets surface. all you would need to get the sips off would be a small set of boosters or maybe just a couple of tugs.
i am not saying that this would be a major fleet base, just a place were research can be performed without bothering anyone else. there would be research facilities, testing facilities, small productions facilities, and a small shipyard. this woul allow limited production runs for advanced craft like the Ares and the eryines when the were in their first stage of testing and deployment, and for prototypes.
neptune, do to its location and strategic value, would most likely have a full military as well as civilian presence.
__________________
GRAVITY DOES NOT EXIST, EARTH SUCKS.
"I might not agree to your opinion but I defend to death your right to express it." - Voltaire"
I'm going to deal with this the only way a Bundy knows how. With swift and blinding violence." ----Kelly Bundy
Death to all Egrets! --- ME:)
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|