 |
shim
Murdock
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 117 |
New AMD chip
how many of you guys/gals have heard of the new chip AMD will be commin out?
btw tis called Opteron..
__________________
there was death at its begginning, and there will be death at its end
For a great place for Red Faction map's go to [URL=http://www.aodmeagain.com]Me Again's Map Site[/URL]
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
08-04-2002 04:27 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
Admiral LSD
Murdock
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Northam, W.A. Australia
Posts: 235 |
FYI: Opteron is the name of the Server chip. I can't remember the name of the desktop chip off-hand though...
__________________
"Don't stop, baby, dreamin'"
"Don't stop, baby, lovin'"
"Don't stop, babe, believin'"
Wasurenaide...
"Don't stop, baby, dreamin'"
"Don't stop, baby, lovin'"
"Don't stop, babe, believin'"
...Watashi ga iru koto o.
Itsudatte soba ni iru yo.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
08-04-2002 04:44 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
shim
Murdock
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 117 |
but still it is AMD's new chip in the making..
hmmm, 64 bit processor..
could that other one be a uPGA thoroughbread processor? if so thats for NOTEBOOKS only..
__________________
there was death at its begginning, and there will be death at its end
For a great place for Red Faction map's go to [URL=http://www.aodmeagain.com]Me Again's Map Site[/URL]
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
08-04-2002 06:42 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
Alphakiller
Volition Watch

Registered: Aug 2000
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 2894 |
AMD's Opteron is a renamed Sledgehammer. The desktop line of that chip is called Clawhammer.
It's not the next thing in the pipeline for AMD, either.
First, they're going to try and boost the current AthlonXP up to a 333MHz FSB, and then the Barton chip is next out. After that, if I remember this right, comes Clawhammer/Sledgehammer (Well, Opteron. Whatever )
__________________
[url="http://www.dopefish.com"]swim...swim...hungry...[/url]
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
08-04-2002 07:06 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
shim
Murdock
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 117 |
i wonder what Intel's reply to this would be..
__________________
there was death at its begginning, and there will be death at its end
For a great place for Red Faction map's go to [URL=http://www.aodmeagain.com]Me Again's Map Site[/URL]
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
08-04-2002 08:39 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
Bobboau
BWO Team Member

Registered: Jul 2000
Location: belleville IL USA
Posts: 1428 |
pentium 5
4.333 Ghz
500 Mhz fsb
just a guess
__________________
Bobboau, bringing you products that work ......... In theory
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
08-04-2002 10:50 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
Brando
Defiler of Posts

Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 1379 |
What ever happened to intel's "Itanium" line?
the last I had heard, was an article in an issue of boot PC (now maximum pc), and they had a vote on how to pronounce it.
"Stee-ooo-pid" won, i think.
__________________
Volition Watch Hosting Administrator
[url=http://www.volitionwatch.com/]You Are Here[/url]
Member of the Volition Community since 1998!
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
08-05-2002 04:27 AM |
|
|
|  |
 |
Alphakiller
Volition Watch

Registered: Aug 2000
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 2894 |
Itanium (I-tanium is how I pronounce it) still exists. Itanium II is coming out soon, I think. I could ask an Intel whore I know (he like worships them, but he knows EVERYTHING about Intel - very useful for info, not useful to argue with him ) if you want.
It's a pure server CPU, since it runs pure 64-bit (everything you use nowadays is 32-bit for the moment) so no consumer applications are out for it. It's obscenely expensive (couple thousand dollars or something) but also ungodly powerful for what it's designed to do.
It's something you never hear about though since it's rare server material ... most people don't need or have software for it.
quote:
pentium 5
4.333 Ghz
500 Mhz fsb
No. Intel's at 2.54 now, IIRC, they are not going to double their clockspeed in a snap. IIRC they're hoping for 3.0GHz by January 1, 2003. Oh and the new Northwood-B core Pentium 4s already have a 533MHz FSB (4x133) so more than likely we'll see Intel sticking with 533 and eventually their next migration will probably be a 666MHz FSB...but I can't guarantee that, obviously (seriously, although you can make all the Satan jokes you want, migrating from 4x133 to 4x166 is the most likely move )
__________________
[url="http://www.dopefish.com"]swim...swim...hungry...[/url]
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
08-05-2002 09:55 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
Brando
Defiler of Posts

Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 1379 |
IIRC?
__________________
Volition Watch Hosting Administrator
[url=http://www.volitionwatch.com/]You Are Here[/url]
Member of the Volition Community since 1998!
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
08-06-2002 02:29 AM |
|
|
|  |
 |
Admiral LSD
Murdock
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Northam, W.A. Australia
Posts: 235 |
quote: Originally posted by Alphakiller
It's a pure server CPU, since it runs pure 64-bit (everything you use nowadays is 32-bit for the moment) so no consumer applications are out for it. It's obscenely expensive (couple thousand dollars or something) but also ungodly powerful for what it's designed to do.
It's something you never hear about though since it's rare server material ... most people don't need or have software for it.
Intel couldn't market is as a desktop CPU even if they wanted too... You see, Itaniums run at something 733-800Mhz and Intel have been marketing their chips from the angle of "More Mhz = More Performance." How are they going to convince people that a 733Mhz 64-bit CPU can outpace a 2000Mhz 32-bit one?
__________________
"Don't stop, baby, dreamin'"
"Don't stop, baby, lovin'"
"Don't stop, babe, believin'"
Wasurenaide...
"Don't stop, baby, dreamin'"
"Don't stop, baby, lovin'"
"Don't stop, babe, believin'"
...Watashi ga iru koto o.
Itsudatte soba ni iru yo.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
08-06-2002 03:20 AM |
|
|
|  |
 |
Brando
Defiler of Posts

Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 1379 |
thats true, they can't show they lied to the public, about MHZ > power.
My favorite part of the MS technet briefing I went to, is when they showed that an intel P4 1.5ghz cpu outperformed an intel P3 800mhz cpu.
__________________
Volition Watch Hosting Administrator
[url=http://www.volitionwatch.com/]You Are Here[/url]
Member of the Volition Community since 1998!
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
08-06-2002 05:56 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
aldo_14
Hannibal
Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 882 |
Intel will do what they like to do - slap on a hideously long pipeline (hmm.... howsabout 35 stages this time lads? Brilliant), then spend billions of dollars on some hideously complex control logic to make it semi efficeint.......
__________________
VBB Survivor - Mar 2001 to 12 April 2002 - 1107 posts
Hit it 'til it gives up....
[URL=http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/reciprocity]RECIPROCITY[/URL] [URL=http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/reciprocity/demo.html]The Luyten Incident[/URL]
[URL=http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/reciprocity/casualtiesofwar/main.htm]Casualties of War[/URL]
ICQ: 119819902
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
08-07-2002 09:53 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
F S W
Murdock
Registered: Mar 2002
Location:
Posts: 409 |
Intenl and MicroSoft are best friends... Just look at them recommending each other's products.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
08-10-2002 03:18 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
| All times are EST. The time now is 11:35 PM. |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|  |
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|