VWBB
Show all 8 posts from this thread on one page

VWBB (https://volitionwatch.game-warden.com/vwbb/index.php)
- The Babylon Project (https://volitionwatch.game-warden.com/vwbb/forumdisplay.php?forumid=16)
-- This guy knows what im talking about (https://volitionwatch.game-warden.com/vwbb/showthread.php?threadid=4827)


Posted by IceFire on 12-02-2001 05:45 AM:

Exclamation This guy knows what im talking about

I read this on the B5 FirstOnes forum. Read the last 1/3rd. Its the same thing I've been saying to everyone since the beginnig of time (or this MOD).

quote:
It is important to remember that we were walking a bit of a tight rope. We wanted to have good simulation, but at the same time preserve the "look and feel" of the show.
As Randy, Dan, Marc, and Jack can attest I would whine incessantly about the "lack of engines here" or the "need for more turrets" there. I am an engineer by training (B.S. Aerospace, M.S.++ Mechanical), and the shortcomings really irritated me. The answer was, however, always the same. "No, we aren't going to change the model to make it a better design for the game."

So what did we do?
The way this was handled on ItF was as follows: All ships had the ability to speed up or slow down along any axis. Yes, even the ships without forward facing retros could still "decelerate" without having to do flip around. The same holds for the cap-ships.

This didn't mean that they could arbitrarily thrust along any axis quickly, only that they could, at least a little bit.

Is this physically correct in relation to the ship's models? No.

Ships which had the obvious features necessary for good 6DOF flight, particularly if they had large forward-facing engines and/or obvious slew thrusters were given superior abilities to those which did not.

Another source of contradiction and uncertainty was the above mentioned "gravitational thrusters". Minbari and Centauri ships, in particular, are seldom shown with exhaust plumes or other obvious thrust-resultant visual artifacts. In this case, the behavior of the ships as observed in the show, and any footage John Trauger ("the oracle") could come up with were used to try to figure out the performance. This only produced rough guidelines. "Whitestars are very fast", "Auroras (Starfuries) are very maneuverable", "Thunderbolts are a bit faster than Auroras, but a little less maneuverable", "Narn fighters are tough", "Nial (minbari) fighters seem to always be 'wooshing' by their targets", etc.

This was used to make starting performance parameters for each ship type. These were then altered for game balance. Why?

Because of the first law of computer game development.

The absolute most important thing in a computer game is fun gameplay.

Period.

Simulation, visual canon, logic, physics, and everything else will always be sacrificed when they confict with the first law.

A few more things to think about : The artists and designers that created the ships were not engineers. Neither were the writers of the show. Nor were the animators. Not even the Great Maker. That doesn't matter, because their first law was all about story and drama. Everything else didn't matter, which is why even canon from the show must be taken with a grain of salt when trying to make a game, and especially when trying to make an internally consitent, physically correct simulation.

Do the best you can, but make sure to keep the "fun" and "cool" first. If you want more of a simulation, go for it, but you are going to have some tough decisions to make when it comes time for game balance...

He worked on the game and he knew a thing or two about what it was supposed to do.

http://216.15.145.59/mainforums/Forum1/HTML/004430.html

Thought I'd post that, just so you know tham im not a heretic for not sticking with complete show canon and that I'm not 100% insane.

__________________
- IceFire
Volition Watch Project Manager
[url=http://www.volitionwatch.com]Volition Watch[/url], [url=http://freespace.volitionwatch.com/blackwater]BlackWater Operations[/url], [url=http://freespace.volitionwatch.com/babylon]The Babylon Project[/url], [url=http://terra.sourceforge.net]Machina Terra[/url], [url=http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/ott/]Over The Top[/url]


Posted by LAM3O on 12-02-2001 10:26 AM:

Whee!

Screw cannon, i want my Battle B5!!!


Posted by Skullar on 12-02-2001 12:23 PM:

IceFire , not you , I said that since I joined TBP.
I am the atmosphere & gameplay maniac here !

__________________
Freespace 2 : The Babylon Project team member
http://freespace.volitionwatch.com/babylon
-----------------------------
The sun is quite warm,
the universe is fairly large
and I have a loose mouth.


Posted by Alphakiller on 12-02-2001 10:49 PM:

I dunno, Skullar, I've heard Ice say it about a billion times ...

__________________
[url="http://www.dopefish.com"]swim...swim...hungry...[/url]


Posted by Xaphod_x on 12-03-2001 05:15 AM:

now all I need is a jet fighter sim that takes that rule into account..

Strike Commander's getting a little old

__________________
Forgive my stupidity.
---
The Fish Institution
http://www.fishinstitution.com


Posted by Triggy on 12-03-2001 11:20 AM:

More pearls of wisdom from IceFire

Nothing that hasn't been said before but this is eloquent and concise.

__________________
When the final reckoning comes only the damned will be there to see it.


Posted by haderak on 12-03-2001 02:23 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Xaphod_x
now all I need is a jet fighter sim that takes that rule into account..

Strike Commander's getting a little old



Theres one F-16 simulator out there inspired in strike commander
"F-16 agressor" I think that was the name of it. Its also a story of fighter mercs.

__________________
-Weep for us Na'toth, weep for us all, I've seen the darkness, you cannot do that and be the same again... [G'kar, in Revelations]

-No money, no wife, no car, NO PROBLEMS!!!!

Member of Babylon5 to FS2 MOD
http://freespace.volitionwatch.com/babylon/

Member of Wing commander to FS2 MOD
http://www.scifi3d.de/wcsaga/


Posted by tomcat on 12-03-2001 10:59 PM:

Hm fligh sim u say?
Pick one....the best is Flanker 2, then Microprose F4 v.4, the F15, F18 Janes, etc
old stuff Flanker1.5, A10 Cuba, F16, TFX, Totall Air war ..Hornet3 etc..

__________________
eng Horatiu Popovici


All times are EST. The time now is 02:47 AM.
Show all 8 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.2.6
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000, 2001.