VWBB Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]
Show all 74 posts from this thread on one page

VWBB (http://volitionwatch.papageorgefamily/vwbb/index.php)
- Blackwater Ops (http://volitionwatch.papageorgefamily/vwbb/forumdisplay.php?forumid=8)
-- The SMB Vanir (http://volitionwatch.papageorgefamily/vwbb/showthread.php?threadid=5786)


Posted by aldo_14 on 06-14-2002 09:07 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Bobboau
that is actualy a slightly altered snipet of the loadout animation wich works just fine, you need to use anibuilder
and at the moment the big beams don't target it, but they might start to after it rips apart a few dosen Hecates



Odd..... how longs the ani, and where's the 2nd loop point?
I'm using a 54 frame ani, with the 2nd loop at the 10/11th frame - but it just james a few frames after and loops from the 11th - 13th frame - mkes it jutter.

__________________
VBB Survivor - Mar 2001 to 12 April 2002 - 1107 posts

Hit it 'til it gives up....

[URL=http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/reciprocity]RECIPROCITY[/URL] [URL=http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/reciprocity/demo.html]The Luyten Incident[/URL]
[URL=http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/reciprocity/casualtiesofwar/main.htm]Casualties of War[/URL]
ICQ: 119819902


Posted by Bobboau on 06-15-2002 02:02 AM:

it's 0-107, loop point at 51 (I think)

__________________
Bobboau, bringing you products that work ......... In theory


Posted by Bobboau on 06-15-2002 02:02 AM:

it's 0-107, loop point at 51 (I think)

__________________
Bobboau, bringing you products that work ......... In theory


Posted by aldo_14 on 06-15-2002 01:10 PM:

Hmmm...odd. Itc appears that the loop ponit is fixed at the 51st frame, based on the V animations. Bugger

__________________
VBB Survivor - Mar 2001 to 12 April 2002 - 1107 posts

Hit it 'til it gives up....

[URL=http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/reciprocity]RECIPROCITY[/URL] [URL=http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/reciprocity/demo.html]The Luyten Incident[/URL]
[URL=http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/reciprocity/casualtiesofwar/main.htm]Casualties of War[/URL]
ICQ: 119819902


Posted by Epock on 06-28-2002 03:25 PM:

Payload

Wow nice ship, and the Techroom ANi is super cool too.

Just a wee point on logistics from me. Over all Bombers are far more effective than small to medium capital ships, right? At least those present in FS2. In order for it too make sence to have a mix of Capital Mounted weponry and Bomber mounted weponry bombs must be pretty expencive to produce. If they were cheap itd make sence to have 30 bombers and no cap, and there fore not risk 30,000 (dunno if thats right) lives on board say an orion.

That would explain why bombs are only unlocked to the player in FS as he gains exp and proves he wont waste them, or damage friendly vessels.

If you agree with that conclusion that would make a bomber with a huge payload having many eggs in one basket. If it goes down with full payload thats a lot of wasted resources and production!
And if this thing is fat and slow its quiet the juicy target for interceptors (Ever dodge a hail of Tempests in Ursa Heavy Bomber?)


Posted by Epock on 06-28-2002 03:25 PM:

Payload

Wow nice ship, and the Techroom ANi is super cool too.

Just a wee point on logistics from me. Over all Bombers are far more effective than small to medium capital ships, right? At least those present in FS2. In order for it too make sence to have a mix of Capital Mounted weponry and Bomber mounted weponry bombs must be pretty expencive to produce. If they were cheap itd make sence to have 30 bombers and no cap, and there fore not risk 30,000 (dunno if thats right) lives on board say an orion.

That would explain why bombs are only unlocked to the player in FS as he gains exp and proves he wont waste them, or damage friendly vessels.

If you agree with that conclusion that would make a bomber with a huge payload having many eggs in one basket. If it goes down with full payload thats a lot of wasted resources and production!
And if this thing is fat and slow its quiet the juicy target for interceptors (Ever dodge a hail of Tempests in Ursa Heavy Bomber?)


Posted by Bobboau on 06-28-2002 03:33 PM:

it has a lot of turrets

__________________
Bobboau, bringing you products that work ......... In theory


Posted by AdmiralAbaht on 06-28-2002 11:13 PM:

The thing's so big that it itself is a target for other bombers


Posted by AdmiralAbaht on 06-28-2002 11:13 PM:

The thing's so big that it itself is a target for other bombers


Posted by Strikerkid on 06-29-2002 01:27 AM:

lol, looking good here so far, this thing better have loads of turrets or it's gonna be smashed on a regular basis.

__________________
This is commodore Chris the Assassin here, what's your status?


Posted by Strikerkid on 06-29-2002 01:27 AM:

lol, looking good here so far, this thing better have loads of turrets or it's gonna be smashed on a regular basis.

__________________
This is commodore Chris the Assassin here, what's your status?


Posted by Epock on 06-29-2002 04:56 PM:

Yeah but turrets dont stop Tempest Volleys or Trebuchets. And head on countermeasuers aint gonna work. I'll be interested to see how you intend to balance this one.

Either itd have to only be deployed when the situation is ideal, or with heavy fighter support. Shivan Dragons for example would make mushy paste out of it otherwise.


Posted by Epock on 06-29-2002 04:56 PM:

Yeah but turrets dont stop Tempest Volleys or Trebuchets. And head on countermeasuers aint gonna work. I'll be interested to see how you intend to balance this one.

Either itd have to only be deployed when the situation is ideal, or with heavy fighter support. Shivan Dragons for example would make mushy paste out of it otherwise.


Posted by Epock on 06-29-2002 04:58 PM:

On the other hand though unmolested, four of them could take out the beams on a sathaneses arms pretty snappy I bet. Also make a mess out of its subs...


All times are EST. The time now is 08:29 PM. Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]
Show all 74 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.2.6
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000, 2001.