VWBB (http://volitionwatch.papageorgefamily/vwbb/index.php)
- Blackwater Ops (http://volitionwatch.papageorgefamily/vwbb/forumdisplay.php?forumid=8)
-- Gadzooks! A picture! (http://volitionwatch.papageorgefamily/vwbb/showthread.php?threadid=5001)

quote:

---

Originally posted by Cepheid
There is a far different size gap between a Zero and a carrier than there is between a Seraphim and a Hecate.

---

Agreed.

It should also be pointed out that you can fashion a convincing capship defence mission using lots of fighters, but not many at a time. By sending in waves of fighters as well as bombers it's possible to eliminate enough defenders to keep launching reinforcements, thus giving the impression of a big, bloody battle and still keeping the challenge high. That's basically what I tend to do, because it avoids the problem of having too many ships on-screen at once on either side.

That said, I have some suitably large fighter and bomber combats planned for the missions I have set up - one featuring, so far, five wings defending against waves of bomber attack. You can bet that they're big waves.

__________________
"...And so the Sol rebellion was crushed by the mighty literary powers of Kellan."

[url="http://freespace.volitionwatch.com/blackwater"]BlackWater Ops[/url]

Absolutely not. We're talking about a vehicle over 2 kilometers long being impacted by an object perhaps 15 meters long. The difference in mass and inertia is simply immense. Espacially since a destoyer has enough armor to hold off a beam cannon. Even loaded with bombs, it is unlike the destroyer would even be crippled.

__________________
~Cepheid~

"For millions of years, mankind lived just like the animals.
Then something happened that unleashed the power of our imagination.
We learned to talk......."

-Pink Floyd, The Division Bell

And there's a lot more flight deck space on a Hecate than there was on the Enterprise. So if there is debris, fighters can work their way around it.

__________________
~Cepheid~

"For millions of years, mankind lived just like the animals.
Then something happened that unleashed the power of our imagination.
We learned to talk......."

-Pink Floyd, The Division Bell

Also of note the RN ships of the pacific fleet (yes Britain was in WW2!!) were to a great extent immune to the dive bombers and kamakazi fighters of the Japanese, of note was the British Carrier Illustrious taking 3 direct kamakazi hits to the flightdeck, none of which penetrated the stell amour plating.

The power of air power in ww2 is in effect over rated and a biased opinion is given simply because the makeup of forces arrayed was wrong. The Bizmark was a great ship, it was however not a hulking great big top of the line battle ship, it was closer to a heavy cruiser then a battleship, which is what the hood was. The Rodney (Britains latest battleship deployed in 1939, or any of the new US Battlesips) could have destroyed the bizmark one on one.

The Yamato was sunk because budget cuts meant that it had 2nd hand 15inch cruiser turrets with cruiser amour, which was easly penetrated by dive bombers.

Air power shouldnt have been as effective as it was, but it was so effective because the admirals who faced each other either obsessed about it or ignored it. Those who ignored it paid the price by making easly avoidable errors (German's, no carriers aa weapons made to track fast fighters or higher level bombers no inbetween setting) and those who embraced did so at the cost of a more balanced fighting force (Japanese did not have enough destroyers or heavy cruisers to cover their battleships and carriers)

But who had the most effective air forces?

MUAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Finland! Ya jerks! MUAHAHAHAHA!

We dropped the most enemy fighters and bombers when compared to the amount of fighters we had then!

Our land forces were pretty good too... minimal losses compared to those heavy losses on enemy side.

Too bad we didn't really have naval fleet...

__________________
[URL=http://freespace.volitionwatch.com/babylon/]The Babylon Project homepage[/URL] <> [URL=http://freespace.volitionwatch.com/babylon/faq.php]The Babylon Project FAQ[/URL] <> [URL=http://freespace.volitionwatch.com/fsscp/]Please support FreeSpace Source Code Project[/URL]

Air power was (and is) so powerful because it's a different medium. In space, where everything is flying, capital ships bristling with guns are just as important as fighters, although in many ways that depends on the technologies involved. Once the GTVA develops shielded caps, it's all over for the fighters....they'll be as obselete as the battleship is now.

__________________
WE ARE HARD LIGHT PRODUCTIONS. YOU WILL LOWER YOUR FIREWALLS AND SURRENDER YOUR COMPUTERS. WE WILL ADD YOUR INTELLECTUAL AND VERNACULAR DISTINCTIVENESS TO OUR OWN. YOUR FORUM WILL ADAPT TO SERVICE US. RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mr. Fury
But who had the most effective air forces?

---

quote:

---

IDF - USAF EXERCISES, MED, 5 May 99
In mock air battles during training exercises held about 2 months ago in the Negev between Israeli and US air force, Israeli pilots "shot down" 220 US aircraft, compared to 20 Israeli aircraft "shot down" by Ameri-can pilots. The exercise was the first time Israeli pilots trained against foreign pilots on such a wide scale. In the past, the IAF objected to such exercises for fear it would expose IAF tactics. However in recent years, IAF commander General Eitan Ben Eliyahu has increased such exercises to help train Israeli pilots against new tactics.
The US pilots flew F14 & F18 jets against the Israeli F15 & F16 jets. While the Israeli pilots drew much praise from the Americans, the Israeli side played down the one-sided results saying that the mock battles were mostly in close air battles - which is a particular strength of the Israelis.

---

__________________
"He who laughs last thinks slowest."
"Just becase you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you."
"To err is human; to really screw up you need a computer."
Creator of the [url="http://www.geocities.com/sandvich/"]Sandvich Bar[/url]

In similar exercises, Canadian pilots using CF-18's (F/A-18 A's) and simulated Sparrow missiles for Canadian pilots and AMRAAM missiles for American pilots, beat their American counterparts.

It happens. That doesn't deny the fact that American pilots are some of the best in the world, it just says that others have some of the best pilots in the world as well.

The IAF and RCAF for instance

__________________
- IceFire
Volition Watch Project Manager
[url=http://www.volitionwatch.com]Volition Watch[/url], [url=http://freespace.volitionwatch.com/blackwater]BlackWater Operations[/url], [url=http://freespace.volitionwatch.com/babylon]The Babylon Project[/url], [url=http://terra.sourceforge.net]Machina Terra[/url], [url=http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/ott/]Over The Top[/url]

Canada has a military?!

__________________
I was here then I wasn't, now I'm dead

If moose made up their military strength, then yes.

Yes. We are quite the pasifists here in Canada. We have about 6 working ships in our navy.

Quite pathetic. But we used to have an impressive military.

what if america invades you?

__________________
[URL=http://www.shatteredstar.com]Shattered Star Confederation[/URL]

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mr Carrot

The Yamato was sunk because budget cuts meant that it had 2nd hand 15inch cruiser turrets with cruiser amour, which was easly penetrated by dive bombers.

---

__________________
~Cepheid~

"For millions of years, mankind lived just like the animals.
Then something happened that unleashed the power of our imagination.
We learned to talk......."

-Pink Floyd, The Division Bell

Yes the fore and aft 15 inch turrets moutned behind the 18 inch turrets were taken from the Mogami class light cruisers , and such they only had light cruiser amour, though these were later removed and replaced with 100 mm guns the weakness of the turret mounting and barcketing remained (only the top section of turret was replaced) and this led to serious amour defects which allowed american dive bomber bombs to penetrate if i recall number 3 magazine far in advance of its relevant damage threshold.

Canada has a well trained military, but we just don't have anything to use. Our CF-18's are F/A-18 A's, our tanks are old, our helicopters need months in the repair shop after a 2 hour flight, and only our navy is worth anything and we've got something like 12 destroyers and 2 subarmines in total. Its quite pathetic.

__________________
- IceFire
Volition Watch Project Manager
[url=http://www.volitionwatch.com]Volition Watch[/url], [url=http://freespace.volitionwatch.com/blackwater]BlackWater Operations[/url], [url=http://freespace.volitionwatch.com/babylon]The Babylon Project[/url], [url=http://terra.sourceforge.net]Machina Terra[/url], [url=http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/ott/]Over The Top[/url]

Im sure Canada will be better off with Indian spears and pitchforks.

quote:

---

Originally posted by IceFire
Canada has a well trained military, but we just don't have anything to use. Our CF-18's are F/A-18 A's, our tanks are old, our helicopters need months in the repair shop after a 2 hour flight, and only our navy is worth anything and we've got something like 12 destroyers and 2 subarmines in total. Its quite pathetic.

---

__________________
"...And so the Sol rebellion was crushed by the mighty literary powers of Kellan."

[url="http://freespace.volitionwatch.com/blackwater"]BlackWater Ops[/url]

If Canada ever came under some kind of attack they would probably be reinforced by the Americans due to the proximity and close relations.

But why would anyone attack Canada of all countries?

quote:

---

Originally posted by Kellan


Don't view it as pathetic; view it as good! Canada is leading the world in disarmament! If we all had military forces like those of Canada, hardly anybody would be able to hurt anyone else!

---